Sacrosanct for me but not for thee

Roy Jacobsen:

How is it that some people can see the Constitution as a “living, breathing” document, that it must be adapted and interpreted in the light of our changing culture, and that we are able to find new rights and laws in the emenations of the penumbra of the aureola. And yet these very same people would have an absolute conniption if you suggested using the same approach on Roe v. Wade?
[Via Blogs4God, with the above title shamelessly ripped off from one of Roy’s commenters.]